Arizona Rep. David Schweikert (R-CD6) will assume the chairmanship of the U.S. House of Representatives' Subcommittee on Environment. Schweikert says he is "honored" and sees it as an opportunity to rein in the Obama Administration's propensity to "impose its will on the American people through regulatory fiat."
Though the news release from the Science, Space and Technology Committee does focus on the oversight function, the statement from Chair Lamar Smith (R-TX) does note that the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") should "utilize the best available science.” Neither Smith nor Schweikert mentioned protecting the environment as a present concern of the committee.
Schweikert's office notes that the Subcommittee also has jurisdiction over "the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)."
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com or call 602-799-7025. Thanks.
News/info regarding Arizona's politics. U.S. Senate, Congress, Governor, statewide offices, initiatives, and - where we can - county and local. We aim to present objective information (unless labeled as "commentary") and do original reporting. Drop us an e-mail with tips/comments/questions/etc - info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Twitter: @AZs_Politics, phone:602-799-7025. Operated by co-founder Paul Weich. Sister site/program is ArizonasLaw.org. Want to join our team? Inquire within.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
It's important to note that Schweikert did not adopt the tone that Gosar took when he set up the dog and pony show last summer to bash the EPA. I'm cautiously optimistic that the Arizona Congressman will approach his responsibilities in the subcommittee chairmanship with the fairness and concern for the best scientific insight available. If he does that, and guards against Tea Party irrationality, it may, in fact, end up being a good thing for Arizona.
Thanks, Steve. True, the tone may be slightly different. But, the messaging was all oversight, no mention about the environment.
Post a Comment