(edited at 3:00pm to add dollar amounts)
The Yuma County Republican Party ("Yuma GOP") is the principle funder behind mailers sent out yesterday attacking Democrats in four key state legislative races around the state. The left-leaning national political internet-based news and opinion website Talking Points Memo ("TPM") was the first to report on this news today, focusing on the mailers' "less-than-subtle hint that the Democrat in question -- in the case of a GOP mailer obtained by TPM, two-term state Rep. Rae Waters -- is somehow inviting hordes of blood-thirsty illegal immigrants into Arizona's peaceful suburbs...."
Besides Waters in LD20 - which covers parts of Phoenix and the southeast valley - Arizona's Politics is the first to report that the Republican group is also attacking David Schapira - looking to move from the House to the Senate in LD17 (Tempe) - Sens. Rebecca Rios (LD 23, Pinal Cty.) and Amanda Aguirre (LD24, western AZ).
Here is a picture of the flier, per TPM:
The "independent expenditure" group mailing these out is called the Arizona Business Development Coalition ("ABDC"). On the mailer, it identifies the Yuma County Republican Party as the major funder. The mailers - and one newspaper ad against Waters - cost a total of $18,526.17, according to the filed "trigger report". Nealy half of that amount is aimed at the one house seat currently held by Waters. She is running against incumbent Bob Robson and Jeff Dial.
The group registered with the state in June, and reported having no contributions or expenditures as of its last filing on September 13. It filed a trigger report yesterday with the info regarding the mailers.
Sidenote of mild interest - on two levels - to political junkies: The chair of the ABDC is Mike Brewer, owner of a local Benjamin Franklin Plumbing franchise. (The group shares the address with the plumbing office.) No dirty tricks here, though!
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
News/info regarding Arizona's politics. U.S. Senate, Congress, Governor, statewide offices, initiatives, and - where we can - county and local. We aim to present objective information (unless labeled as "commentary") and do original reporting. Drop us an e-mail with tips/comments/questions/etc - info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Twitter: @AZs_Politics, phone:602-799-7025. Operated by co-founder Paul Weich. Sister site/program is ArizonasLaw.org. Want to join our team? Inquire within.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
FOLLOWING MONEY IN ARIZONA'S POLITICS: DCCC Drops Another (Nearly) Half-Million On Two Arizona Races
As we get closer to November, the independent expenditures on behalf of or against Congressional candidates will continue to increase. Arizona's Politics will check in regularly on the reports that these groups must submit to the Federal Election Commission. Here are the details for this week's filings.
Our previous reports on Independent Expenditures in Arizona's Congressional campaigns were posted on October 7, October 4, September 30, and September 28.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee ("DCCC") made another mega-media ad buy in the Phoenix and Flagstaff markets today. The ad buy is nearly evenly split between anti-David Schweikert (CD5) and anti-Paul Gosar (CD1) spots.
In today's filings, the DCCC notified the Federal Election Commission ("FEC") that it spent $238,480.08 opposing Schweikert in his renewed bid to unseat Democrat Harry Mitchell, and that it spent $233,309.51 opposing Gosar in his first-time campaign against first-term incumbent Ann Kirkpatrick.
On the other end of the dollar spectrum, "NARAL-Pro Choice America" spent $24.12 on "list rental" supporting Gabrielle Giffords (Dem., CD8) in her campaign to retain her seat against Jesse Kelly.
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
Our previous reports on Independent Expenditures in Arizona's Congressional campaigns were posted on October 7, October 4, September 30, and September 28.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee ("DCCC") made another mega-media ad buy in the Phoenix and Flagstaff markets today. The ad buy is nearly evenly split between anti-David Schweikert (CD5) and anti-Paul Gosar (CD1) spots.
In today's filings, the DCCC notified the Federal Election Commission ("FEC") that it spent $238,480.08 opposing Schweikert in his renewed bid to unseat Democrat Harry Mitchell, and that it spent $233,309.51 opposing Gosar in his first-time campaign against first-term incumbent Ann Kirkpatrick.
On the other end of the dollar spectrum, "NARAL-Pro Choice America" spent $24.12 on "list rental" supporting Gabrielle Giffords (Dem., CD8) in her campaign to retain her seat against Jesse Kelly.
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
Brewer Campaign Getting Hot and Sweaty? Starts Re-raising Ancient "Goddard Is Gay" Rumors, Posts 20-Year Old AZScam Transcript
Maybe the Rocky Mountain Poll showing incumbent Gov. Jan Brewer under 50% (38% among all voters) is more worrisome than the Brewer campaign is letting on. How else to explain trying to re-raise old "Goddard is gay" rumors?
Dennis Welch at the Arizona Guardian has posted a story (paid subscription required) noting that top Brewer political adviser Chuck Coughlin claimed that reporters should ask Democratic nominee Terry Goddard if he is gay if they are going to ask Brewer for her health records.
After the story went up, Coughlin's political consulting firm posted and tweeted links trying to justify bringing that whisper campaign into the public arena through the back door. They claim that it is justified because it shows that it is as irrelevant as the rumors that Governor Brewer has health issues that could effect her ability to serve out her term.
This is how Coughlin/Higher Ground points out the "lack of relevance". Here is the Tweet: (@azhighground
HighGround, Inc.): The latest Brewer rumormongering is about as relevant as this 20 year old AZSCAM transcript." That Tweet links to this post on Higher Ground's blog, posted earlier this hour (notwithstanding East Coast time showing):
Wow! Besides getting in the catty "three times" comment (whoa, shades of late Gov. Mecham), they manage to send us to a 20-year old transcript of two anonymous guys speculating on Goddard's sexual preference. Without context.
Limp protestations aside, what Higher Ground has done in trotting out - on behalf of their client, the Governor - is far different from what two persons not working for the Goddard campaign have done regarding the health rumors.
EDIT: Timeline on this:
1) John Dougherty brings up Brewer health rumor on his Facebook page.
2) Francine Hardaway posts on Huffington Post about it.
3) Brewer campaign denies health rumor.
4) Coughlin brings in gay rumor to Guardian.
5) Higher Ground posts the AZScam transcript.
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
Dennis Welch at the Arizona Guardian has posted a story (paid subscription required) noting that top Brewer political adviser Chuck Coughlin claimed that reporters should ask Democratic nominee Terry Goddard if he is gay if they are going to ask Brewer for her health records.
After the story went up, Coughlin's political consulting firm posted and tweeted links trying to justify bringing that whisper campaign into the public arena through the back door. They claim that it is justified because it shows that it is as irrelevant as the rumors that Governor Brewer has health issues that could effect her ability to serve out her term.
This is how Coughlin/Higher Ground points out the "lack of relevance". Here is the Tweet: (@azhighground
HighGround, Inc.): The latest Brewer rumormongering is about as relevant as this 20 year old AZSCAM transcript." That Tweet links to this post on Higher Ground's blog, posted earlier this hour (notwithstanding East Coast time showing):
The latest rumormongering about Governor Brewer is about as relevant as this 20 year old AZSCAM transcript. Questions are raised and the media pursuit legitimizes a topic no matter how irrelevant. In no way is anyone suggesting that there is a problem with being gay, but it has a common lack of relevance to this race for Governor as the unfounded rumors being perpetuated by Goddard and his democrat operatives.
It may not be sexy for Team Goddard to talk about running a state during a campaign – something the Governor has been excelling at since January of 2009. Terry Goddard has tried three times to be Governor and has failed. This time will be no different.
Wow! Besides getting in the catty "three times" comment (whoa, shades of late Gov. Mecham), they manage to send us to a 20-year old transcript of two anonymous guys speculating on Goddard's sexual preference. Without context.
Limp protestations aside, what Higher Ground has done in trotting out - on behalf of their client, the Governor - is far different from what two persons not working for the Goddard campaign have done regarding the health rumors.
EDIT: Timeline on this:
1) John Dougherty brings up Brewer health rumor on his Facebook page.
2) Francine Hardaway posts on Huffington Post about it.
3) Brewer campaign denies health rumor.
4) Coughlin brings in gay rumor to Guardian.
5) Higher Ground posts the AZScam transcript.
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
You know it must be early ballot time when...
...you get mailings from Planned Parenthood and National Right to Life on the same day. (And, no, they did not agree on Harry Mitchell or David Schweikert - that won't happen 'til the lion and the lamb hang out together or something.) NARAL has also filed that they spent money on mailers - mine must have been delayed due to Columbus day.
By the way, the real point of this post is that I would like to fact check as many of these mailers as possible over the next few weeks. So, please feel free to scan and e-mail material that you believe should be looked at more closely. Thanks!
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
By the way, the real point of this post is that I would like to fact check as many of these mailers as possible over the next few weeks. So, please feel free to scan and e-mail material that you believe should be looked at more closely. Thanks!
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
Thursday, October 7, 2010
WATCH: NEA's New TV Ad Attacking Schweikert; partial Fact Check
Previously, we reported that the National Education Association has spent $650,000 to run an ad in the Phoenix market attacking Republican challenger David Schweikert. Here is the ad:
http://www.youtube.com/user/NEAFundCampaignAds#p/a/u/1/yS6GSQkRLi4
The Arizona CD5 race is one of two that the NEA has decided to kick off its campaign ads with (the other in Ohio).
While a fuller Fact Check of the ad will be published later, the citation for the middle claim caught my eye. Below the graphic that Schweikert "Would Abolish the Department of Education" was a cite for a DCCC (Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee) YouTube from September 21. It turns out that it is a 21-second clip of Schweikert at a "Fountain Hills Tea Party forum" on September 17. In it, Schweikert passionately says:
http://www.youtube.com/user/NEAFundCampaignAds#p/a/u/1/yS6GSQkRLi4
The Arizona CD5 race is one of two that the NEA has decided to kick off its campaign ads with (the other in Ohio).
While a fuller Fact Check of the ad will be published later, the citation for the middle claim caught my eye. Below the graphic that Schweikert "Would Abolish the Department of Education" was a cite for a DCCC (Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee) YouTube from September 21. It turns out that it is a 21-second clip of Schweikert at a "Fountain Hills Tea Party forum" on September 17. In it, Schweikert passionately says:
"And now it's time for the tough part. What are you willing to cut? If I stood up in front of you and say if you love the Department of Education, please don't vote for me. Because I'm passionately going to try to eliminate those functions of the federal government that are, (a), unconstitutional, and (b), the fact we're bankrupt."(video after the jump)
BEYOND HYPER-PARTISANSHIP... NOT!: GOP Party Officials Ready To Punish Grant Woods For Endorsing Rotellini
A couple of weeks ago, former Arizona Attorney General Grant Woods (Republican) endorsed Democratic candidate Felecia Rotellini to be the next AG. Tonight, the Maricopa County Republican Party is ready to strip Woods' vote from county GOP business. Woods is a Republican Precinct Committeeperson.
Woods lashed back with his response and went public with the party's move. Both the Arizona Republic and the East Valley Tribune feature different parts of his response.
Some of the more fun lines:
--"According to you, if there were a hypothetical race between Thomas Jefferson, Democrat, and Lindsay Lohan, Republican, I could not endorse Jefferson over Lohan,''
--"Since I am the only Republican elected to the position of Arizona Attorney General in the last twenty years and since I led all candidates on the ballot in 1990 and 1994 and served eight years at AG, it seemed to me that I might be in a position to independently assess who would be the best person to be our next Attorney General. In this year’s election, in my judgment, it is not even close. Felicia Rotellini would be an outstanding Attorney General.
“Many Republicans spent the better part of this year arguing that Mr. Horne is unfit to hold the office of Attorney General and that people should vote for Andrew Thomas. Then, like Mr. Thomas, on the day after he lost they endorsed Mr. Horne. I found their arguments unconvincing before and after the election. But their lack of logic is reflected in your ‘rule.' ”
--"I am disappointed that I won't be able to vote on your important resolutions on 'issues' such as secession from the union and the never-ending pursuit of the president's birth certificate, but I will get over it,''
Outgoing Republican State Sen. Carolyn Allen also endorsed Rotellini at the news conference in September. No word if the party will move to kick her out of the caucus in the event of a special session.
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
Woods lashed back with his response and went public with the party's move. Both the Arizona Republic and the East Valley Tribune feature different parts of his response.
Some of the more fun lines:
--"According to you, if there were a hypothetical race between Thomas Jefferson, Democrat, and Lindsay Lohan, Republican, I could not endorse Jefferson over Lohan,''
--"Since I am the only Republican elected to the position of Arizona Attorney General in the last twenty years and since I led all candidates on the ballot in 1990 and 1994 and served eight years at AG, it seemed to me that I might be in a position to independently assess who would be the best person to be our next Attorney General. In this year’s election, in my judgment, it is not even close. Felicia Rotellini would be an outstanding Attorney General.
“Many Republicans spent the better part of this year arguing that Mr. Horne is unfit to hold the office of Attorney General and that people should vote for Andrew Thomas. Then, like Mr. Thomas, on the day after he lost they endorsed Mr. Horne. I found their arguments unconvincing before and after the election. But their lack of logic is reflected in your ‘rule.' ”
--"I am disappointed that I won't be able to vote on your important resolutions on 'issues' such as secession from the union and the never-ending pursuit of the president's birth certificate, but I will get over it,''
Outgoing Republican State Sen. Carolyn Allen also endorsed Rotellini at the news conference in September. No word if the party will move to kick her out of the caucus in the event of a special session.
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
FOLLOWING MONEY IN ARIZONA'S POLITICS: Money Gets BIGGER Day By Day; DCCC and NEA Up Ante - Million Dollar Day, Others Chip In
As we get closer to November, the independent expenditures on behalf of or against Congressional candidates will continue to increase. Arizona's Politics will check in regularly on the reports that these groups must submit to the Federal Election Commission. Here are the details for this week's filings.
Our previous reports on Independent Expenditures in Arizona's Congressional campaigns were posted on October 4, September 30, and September 28.
Local TV stations in Flagstaff, Tucson and Phoenix have reason to smile. Many reasons, as independent expenditure groups continue to up their ad buys to attack their opponents. In fact, Tuesday and Wednesday brought more than one million dollars to Arizona's broadcasters. Sure, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee ("DCCC") and the National Republican Congressional Committee ("NRCC") both sent more money to AZ broadcasters this week; but, so did the National Education Association and the Family Research Council. Meanwhile, it is apparent that 9 out of 10 dentists support colleague Republican Paul Gosar in his CD1 challenge against Democrat Ann Kirkpatrick. Finally in this edition of "Following Money", we learn the value that the National Right To Life Group puts on advertisements in their newspaper.
1) The "NEA Fund For Children and Public Education" plunked down $650,000.00 yesterday to produce and run an ad against GOP challenger David Schweikert in CD5. The biggest single ad buy we have seen yet in this campaign.
2) The "Family Research Council Action PAC" today bought $15,327.00 of ads in the Tucson market attacking Democratic incumbent Gabrielle Giffords. They spent $2,850.00 to produce the ad.
3) The NRCC yesterday spent $16,300.00 on media opposing Kirkpatrick. This brings their total spent on that race (so far) to more than $375,000.
4) The DCCC went big on Tuesday and again on Wednesday. First, it spent nearly a quarter-million dollars ($247,944.10) on ads attacking Schweikert, and the next day went over a quarter-million ($256,060.19) attacking Gosar. They also spent an additional $17,561.13 and $10,745.00, respectively, on production.
5) The American Dental Association's Ind. Exp. committee smiled as they plunked down another $39,133.00 on direct mail on behalf of Paul Gosar, DDS. They have spent money on other mailers and phone surveying.
6) Finally, the "National Right To Life PAC" put ads in its "NRL News" on behalf of most of Arizona's Republican congressional candidates. The House ads for Ben Quayle, Ruth McClung, Jesse Kelly, and Gosar were each valued at $19.15. The ad for Sen. John McCain is valued at $56.10.
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
Our previous reports on Independent Expenditures in Arizona's Congressional campaigns were posted on October 4, September 30, and September 28.
Local TV stations in Flagstaff, Tucson and Phoenix have reason to smile. Many reasons, as independent expenditure groups continue to up their ad buys to attack their opponents. In fact, Tuesday and Wednesday brought more than one million dollars to Arizona's broadcasters. Sure, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee ("DCCC") and the National Republican Congressional Committee ("NRCC") both sent more money to AZ broadcasters this week; but, so did the National Education Association and the Family Research Council. Meanwhile, it is apparent that 9 out of 10 dentists support colleague Republican Paul Gosar in his CD1 challenge against Democrat Ann Kirkpatrick. Finally in this edition of "Following Money", we learn the value that the National Right To Life Group puts on advertisements in their newspaper.
1) The "NEA Fund For Children and Public Education" plunked down $650,000.00 yesterday to produce and run an ad against GOP challenger David Schweikert in CD5. The biggest single ad buy we have seen yet in this campaign.
2) The "Family Research Council Action PAC" today bought $15,327.00 of ads in the Tucson market attacking Democratic incumbent Gabrielle Giffords. They spent $2,850.00 to produce the ad.
3) The NRCC yesterday spent $16,300.00 on media opposing Kirkpatrick. This brings their total spent on that race (so far) to more than $375,000.
4) The DCCC went big on Tuesday and again on Wednesday. First, it spent nearly a quarter-million dollars ($247,944.10) on ads attacking Schweikert, and the next day went over a quarter-million ($256,060.19) attacking Gosar. They also spent an additional $17,561.13 and $10,745.00, respectively, on production.
5) The American Dental Association's Ind. Exp. committee smiled as they plunked down another $39,133.00 on direct mail on behalf of Paul Gosar, DDS. They have spent money on other mailers and phone surveying.
6) Finally, the "National Right To Life PAC" put ads in its "NRL News" on behalf of most of Arizona's Republican congressional candidates. The House ads for Ben Quayle, Ruth McClung, Jesse Kelly, and Gosar were each valued at $19.15. The ad for Sen. John McCain is valued at $56.10.
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
FACT CHECK: State Sen. Russell Pearce Misleading About Obama "Jihad Against Arizona"
(Earlier, the Ahwatukee Foothills News ("AFN") featured (top left, front page) coverage of a speech made by State Sen. Russell Pearce to the Ahwatukee TEA Party on September 15. In it, Pearce reiterated comments made by Gov. Jan Brewer in a letter to Secy of State Hillary Clinton about the U.S. self-review on human rights. Arizona's Politics previously fact-checked those comments, and supplemented it with text and video of the State Department's response to a reporter's question.
The AFN indicated that they would - at some point - run the following Fact Check column. A few issues have since come and gone. Here is the Fact Check that it will, hopefully, still run; AFN's circulation and importance - and, hence, its responsibility to the public - are far greater than this small blog forum.)
AFN’s front page article on State Rep. Russell Pearce’s speech to the Ahwatukee TEA Party reported on his comments. It obviously was not intended to provide a balanced view, nor to fact check Pearce’s claims.
Fortunately, I am able to assist (somewhat) on the latter. I wrote an Aug. 30 article for Arizona’s Politics “fact checking” Gov. Brewer’s letter to Secy. Of State Hillary Clinton, branding the U.S. human rights report (the “UPR”) “unconstitutional.” The letter was found to be “Completely Misleading.”
Pearce apparently bases his Obama/Arizona jihad on two things – the SB1070 suit and the UPR. The judge’s determination in the suit demonstrates – at a minimum - the Administration has a good-faith argument about some of the law’s provisions.
The UPR requires our examination. Pearce told the rally that the U.S.’s “submission of Arizona to judgment by the UN panel – which includes nations such as Saudi Arabia… could be construed as an impeachable offense.” His main factual error in that claim is that it was not “submitted” to “judgment”.
The “Universal Periodic Review” that all nations are submitting is a self-survey of positives/negatives of efforts in the area of human rights. As the UPR indicates, our Declaration of Independence was a key step in furthering human rights and we have been a leader in promoting human rights awareness elsewhere.
Near the end of self-exam of U.S. progress, the UPR politely tip-toes around the Arizona situation. The COMPLETE passage: “A recent Arizona law, S.B. 1070, has generated significant attention and debate at home and around the world. The issue is being addressed in a court action that argues that the federal government has the authority to set and enforce immigration law. That action is ongoing; parts of the law are currently enjoined."
No “submission” to the world. No portrayal of SB1070 as positive or negative. Basically saying, ‘our system is WORKING.”
The three nations reviewing our data and preparing the report - which happens after anyone can comment and is not limited to what is already in the UPR – are Cameroon, France, Japan. The review can result in recommendations, which can be accepted, rejected, or ignored.
Pearce’s factual basis is incorrect. Thus, his conclusion is “Completely Misleading”. The AFN is not expected to fact check every speech it covers; however, in incendiary cases like this, it would be wise. More, including citations, can be found at www.ArizonasPolitics.com.
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
The AFN indicated that they would - at some point - run the following Fact Check column. A few issues have since come and gone. Here is the Fact Check that it will, hopefully, still run; AFN's circulation and importance - and, hence, its responsibility to the public - are far greater than this small blog forum.)
FACT CHECK: Sen. Pearce Misleads Re: Obama “jihad against Arizona”
AFN’s front page article on State Rep. Russell Pearce’s speech to the Ahwatukee TEA Party reported on his comments. It obviously was not intended to provide a balanced view, nor to fact check Pearce’s claims.
Fortunately, I am able to assist (somewhat) on the latter. I wrote an Aug. 30 article for Arizona’s Politics “fact checking” Gov. Brewer’s letter to Secy. Of State Hillary Clinton, branding the U.S. human rights report (the “UPR”) “unconstitutional.” The letter was found to be “Completely Misleading.”
Pearce apparently bases his Obama/Arizona jihad on two things – the SB1070 suit and the UPR. The judge’s determination in the suit demonstrates – at a minimum - the Administration has a good-faith argument about some of the law’s provisions.
The UPR requires our examination. Pearce told the rally that the U.S.’s “submission of Arizona to judgment by the UN panel – which includes nations such as Saudi Arabia… could be construed as an impeachable offense.” His main factual error in that claim is that it was not “submitted” to “judgment”.
The “Universal Periodic Review” that all nations are submitting is a self-survey of positives/negatives of efforts in the area of human rights. As the UPR indicates, our Declaration of Independence was a key step in furthering human rights and we have been a leader in promoting human rights awareness elsewhere.
Near the end of self-exam of U.S. progress, the UPR politely tip-toes around the Arizona situation. The COMPLETE passage: “A recent Arizona law, S.B. 1070, has generated significant attention and debate at home and around the world. The issue is being addressed in a court action that argues that the federal government has the authority to set and enforce immigration law. That action is ongoing; parts of the law are currently enjoined."
No “submission” to the world. No portrayal of SB1070 as positive or negative. Basically saying, ‘our system is WORKING.”
The three nations reviewing our data and preparing the report - which happens after anyone can comment and is not limited to what is already in the UPR – are Cameroon, France, Japan. The review can result in recommendations, which can be accepted, rejected, or ignored.
Pearce’s factual basis is incorrect. Thus, his conclusion is “Completely Misleading”. The AFN is not expected to fact check every speech it covers; however, in incendiary cases like this, it would be wise. More, including citations, can be found at www.ArizonasPolitics.com.
We welcome your comments about this post. Or, if you have something unrelated on your mind, please e-mail to info-at-arizonaspolitics-dot-com. Thanks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)